Skip to main content

Andorid Security Assessment

Recently I got a chance to do security assessment of an Android-based app. As the Internet is full of the methods of doing Android assessment, here I shall try to list down major steps to perform it.
For Intercepting traffic:
1. Download the Android SDK tool from http://developer.android.com/sdk/index.html. It includes SDK and AVD (Android Virtual Device). They are necessary for creating the VM and installing emulator.
2. Once, emulator started, install the android app's .apk file on it. 
3. Configure local web proxies, eg Burp, Paros to intercept the traffic by modifying the Internet setting in Android by Settings->Wirless & Network Settings-> Mobile Networks -> Access Point Names-> Proxy Name(PC's IP address) & Port.
4. Now we may perform the assessment as we do for normal web application.

Code review of the app:
1. Rename the .apk file to .zip file and extract it. You'll find classes.dex file which can be converted into a jar file using a tool called dex2jar. 
2 Now use JD-GUI to convert the jar file to Java source code. Now source code is human readable and a code review can be done on it.

Reviewing the AndroidManifest file for permissions:
1. The AndroidManifest.xml resides into the same folder where classes.dex is available.
2. You need to convert the xml file into a readable text file using a tool called AXMLPrinter2.jar. Go to http://developer.android.com/guide/topics/manifest/manifest-intro.html for info on reviewing permissions contained in AndroidManifest.xml file.

Android app sign check:
1. To check if the application is signed or not you may use a java tool, found in the bin directory of Java installation, called jarsigner:
$ jarsigner -verify my_signed.apk
If the .apk is signed properly, Jarsigner prints "jar verified"
2. To see the certificate information, run the following tool found in the same bin directory:
keytool -printcert -file VScert.cer >> CertDetails.txt

There might be other aspects of Android App assessment as well, that may vary depending on the application,  but these are the few major and necessary methods.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ardilla- New tool for finding SQL Injection and XSS

Three Researchers -- MIT's Adam Kiezun , Stanford's Philip Guo , and Syracuse University's Karthick Jayaraman -- has developed a new tool ' Ardilla ' that automatically finds and exploits SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities in Web applications. It creates inputs that pinpoint bugs in Web applications and then generates SQL injection and XSS attacks. But for now Ardilla is for PHP -based Web app only. The researchers say Ardilla found 68 never-before found vulnerabilities in five different PHP applications using the tool -- 23 SQL injection and 45 XSS flaws. More information is awaited. For their attack generation techniques refer to their document at: http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/mernst/pubs/create-attacks-tr054.pdf
Post a Comment
Read more

File Upload through Null Byte Injection

Sometimes, during file upload we come across situation wherein there would be check on the file extension at the client side as well as server side too. If the application does allow only .jpeg extension to be uploaded, the client side java script checks for the extension of the file before passing the request. We all know that how easily this can be defeated. Some applications, checks for the extension at the server side also. That's not easy to bypass. However there are some ways with which it still can be bypassed. Most of server side scripts are written in high level languages such as Php, Java etc who still use some C/C++ libraries to read the file name and contents. That leads to the problem. In C/C++ a line ends with /00 or which is called Null Byte. So whenever the interpreter sees a null byte at the end of the a string, it stops reading thinking it has reached at the end of the string. This can be used for the bypass. It works for many servers, specially php servers. T
1 comment
Read more

Combining power of Fiddler with Burp

Both are pretty powerful tools when it comes to intercept and modify http communications. But at some point of time, they become even more powerful combo if tied with each other. They complement each other. In a recent pentest I came across a similar situation where in Burp was not able to intercept a specific kind of traffic and Fiddler came to rescue. The application was designed to upload video. The initial communication was straight forward, I mean logging into application, filling up the video details etc. And all these were easily captured by Burp except the point where you hit the Upload Video and it connects to a different server and surprisingly it was not captured by Burp, not sure why, even after repeated attempts. So, I fired Fiddler to see if the it sees this request. But it's a;ways to play with requests using Burp due to it's various functionalities like, Intruder, Repeaters etc. But it was necessary to capture this request in Burp. So the below steps can be
Post a Comment
Read more