Skip to main content

Open Redirection Vulnerability

An open redirect is a vulnerability that exists when a script allows redirection
to an external site by directly calling a specific URL in an unfiltered,unmanaged fashion, which could be used to redirect victims to unintended,malicious web sites.

An open redirect is a very simple vulnerability to exploit.

Consider the following example:
http://www.trustedbank.com/page.redir?target=http://www.anygovtsite.gov/

This is a well-intended URL that takes users to any other trusted site.

But this can be abused in one of the following ways:


The URL can be used for Phishing attack-

http://www.trustedbank.com/page.redir?target=http://www.duplicatesite.com/
The user visiting the trusted bank website will get redirected to the phishing site/malware site.
This can hurt the reputation of organization causing business loss.


This can be further escalated by mal-forming the link. Something like

the following can be used to cause the Denial of Service Attack:

http://www.trustedbank.com/page.redir?target=http://www.trustedbank.com/page.redir?target=
http://www.trustedbank.com/page.redir?target=http://www.trustedbank.com/page.redir?target=http://www.trustedbank.com/page.redir?target=http://www.trustedbank.com/page.redir?target=http://www.trustedbank.com/page.redir?target=
http://www.trustedbank.com/page.redir?target=http://www.trustedbank.com/page.redir?target=......
http://www.trustedbank.com/page.redir?target=http://anymalicioussite.com


Now although the previous link does not perform a DOS, similar trick can practically perform a DOS attack, causing the client to endlessly wait for the reply.

Prevention:

To prevent phishing attacks, or redirection to browser attackers and malware hosts, site
administrators must lock down their redirects.
Again, if site operators must absolutely use redirection, the use of intermediary pages advising
users of the redirection is imperative.
Alternatively, allow redirection only to specifically white-listed sites. For example, administrators could limit linking to external sites only when a user actually clicks on the link while on the main site, thus preventing links in e-mail or instant messages from working.

Few times before Google Image Search was susceptible to this was exploited by phishers.
Cisco web site is also susceptible to this vulnerability.

Comments

minishach said…
Really good. You made a small yet understandable article which gives any beginner a good understanding about the topic. I really like it. Thanks for your wonderful effort.
October 12, 2015 at 5:01 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

File Upload through Null Byte Injection

Sometimes, during file upload we come across situation wherein there would be check on the file extension at the client side as well as server side too. If the application does allow only .jpeg extension to be uploaded, the client side java script checks for the extension of the file before passing the request. We all know that how easily this can be defeated. Some applications, checks for the extension at the server side also. That's not easy to bypass. However there are some ways with which it still can be bypassed. Most of server side scripts are written in high level languages such as Php, Java etc who still use some C/C++ libraries to read the file name and contents. That leads to the problem. In C/C++ a line ends with /00 or which is called Null Byte. So whenever the interpreter sees a null byte at the end of the a string, it stops reading thinking it has reached at the end of the string. This can be used for the bypass. It works for many servers, specially php servers. T
1 comment
Read more

jtool - an alternative to otool

jtool comes with a capability of running on Linux environment. Some ipa scanning tools are created to run on Linux environment where mac environment is not available. In such cases tools such as otool and class-dump-z will not work. So jtool can be an alternative to otool. For more information on jtool please refer to http://www.newosxbook.com/tools/jtool.html . It lists down various commands which have same output as otool or a equivalent. There are several commands mentioned in link. But for our customized requirements and basis checks I have listed down the below ones after running on many binaries. The outputs are similar or equivalent to otool and class-dump-z: Commands for checking PIE flag (ASLR) in jTool jtool -d -v -arch | grep stack ·           Automatic Reference Counting (ARC) protection: jtool -d -v -arch | grep _objc_release ·           To check if the device is jailbroken: jtool -d -v -arch | grep jail ·           Dyldinfo compatible options
1 comment
Read more

'Information Leakage-Improper Error Handling' dropped

From Owasp Top 10 2010 List, the issue 'Information Leakage-Improper Error Handling' has been dropped. But it's not the final list,its child release actually. Bu I feel it shouldn't be set aside because its still the one of the prevalent issues these days. That's why I mailed to Dave Wicher: Hi Dave, Excellent work, Congrats! Just one little query- Don't you think that Information Leakage & Improper Error Handling still deserves to be in Top 10? Dave replied: This topic is clearly a very prevalent issue that deserves attention by most organizations. However, the typical impact of such a flaw is usually very low. Therefore, the overall risk of this type of flaw is lower than the other items in the top 10, which is why it was replaced in this update with one of the 2 new items. Regarding dropping Info Leak/Error handling - It is incredibly prevalent, no question. But their impact is typically very low, so the overall risk is low, which is why it fell out of t
3 comments
Read more