Skip to main content

XML Injection

Description:

XML Injection is an attack technique used to manipulate or compromise the logic of an XML application or service. The injection of unintended XML content and/or structures into an XML message can alter the intend logic of the application. Further, XML injection can cause the insertion of malicious content into the resulting message/document.


How to Exploit:

Inserting hacker@evil.com</Email><UniqueID>0</UniqueID><Email>hacker@evil.com in Email field will yield the following result:

<UserRecord>
<UniqueID>123</UniqueID>
<Name>Henry Ackerman</Name><Email>
hacker@evil.com</Email><UniqueID>0</UniqueID><Email>hacker@evil.com&lt;/Email>
<Address>123 Disk Drive</Address>
<ZipCode>98103</ZipCode>
<PhoneNumber>206-123-4567</PhoneNumber>
</UserRecord>

This will add more one record in XML database with UniqueID=0.



One Live Example:

In order of doing a Web Application Server Assessment we came across something which was vulnerable to XML Injection. We found that the input field was not properly validating the input given by the user. That means there was no XML validation on part of contents and length of the input supplied by the user. The application didn’t have XML Schema (xsd file) against which the XML was being validated.

The application had one admin module where User management function was implemented. The admin can add user, delete user, manage its profile and assign roles and privileges to them.


We entered valid user information in all the respective filed in order to add a user:



We captured the request in proxy. All the data in respective fields were going into XML format as you can see in the here:


We inserted a valid XML payload confirming to the all the required fields required to add a valid user and that adheres to the valid XML structure. You can see the highlighted payload which is being inserted into ‘CustomerView’ filed of the XML:



Upon forwarding the result the application successfully accepts the request and instead of creating a user in the name of ‘validuser’ the application creates another user in the name of ‘hackman’:



Thus an attacker acting as Man in the Middle attack will successfully create a user of his choice and login into the application in unauthorized way.


Countermeasures:


Do not trust client input.

Validate input: length, range, format, and type.

Validate XML streams.

Constrain, reject, and sanitize input.

Encode output.

Restrict the size, length, and depth of parsed XML messages.






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Using an AirPcap device in Windows with Wireshark

Capturing wireless traffic in a Windows environment is unfortunately not as easy as a setting change. As with most Windows-based software, drivers in Windows are often not open source and do not allow for configuration change into monitor mode. With this in mind, we must use a specialized piece of hardware known as an AirPcap device. Once you have obtained an AirPcap device you will be required to install the software on the accompanying CD to your analysis computer. The configurable options include: • Interface - Select the device you are using for your capture here. Some advanced analysis scenarios may require you to use more than one AirPcap device to sniff simultaneously on multiple channels. • Blink LED - Clicking this button will make the LED lights on the AirPcap device blink. This is primarily used to identify the specific adapter you are using if you are using multiple AirPcap devices. • Channel - In this field, you select the channel you want AirPcap to listen on. Extension C...

Some one watching where you visited!

Yes... Mozilla has been susceptible to browser-history stealing java script code. Today, Giorgio posted some cool information about the exploit. Mozilla is already working on this. This bug has been reported. Actually they have set up a web site to show the proof-of-concept. Visit www.statrpanic.com in FF,Safari or Netscape and it will tell you which websites have you been already ! But I am not sure it will work in IE or not because my IE is not responding to the website. Clearing history of visited website makes you safe to this attack. I mean this is one way..may be there are other ways to exploit this. But I have found this effective. Try it yourself in FF and then in IE and see the results.

Hijacking SSL

SSL has been in centerstage of researches as well as attacks for quite long time. Last year in a conference in Germany researchers showed how to generate duplicate certificates exploiting MD5 hashing to break SSL. Later in Black Hat, Maxie showed how to exploit a field in SSL certificates to sign an own forged certificate to present it to the client. The main feature of this attack was that the client will never get any warning dialog box by the browser and subsequently the hacker doing an MITM can see the conversation between the client and server. The client will even get a PADLOCK sign to be assured that all things are going via encryption, but in reality it's not. Maxie released a tool SSLStrip to carry out these attacks. The tool has been used by many researchers around the world to carry out the attacks. They all used Unix machines as many open source utilities makes it easier to run the tool on it. My attempt was to run the tool on a Windows machine. It has been never easy t...