Skip to main content

DoS with LIKE query

I was assessing an application. The application was properly sanitizing all the characters which have special meaning for SQL Injection attack. So SQL Injection was not possible in the application. But then again I came across few search modules in the application where it was taking input of part numbers to proceed.
I entered single quote(') and the application was perfectly filtering it returning "Parts can't be found". Then out of curiosity I entered '%' character and observed the response. Now the application stuck into the loop of the search continuously searching.The two things I deduced from it:
1. The application was using LIKE query to search matching terms.
2. This can be used to perform a DoS by overloading the database.

The % and _ qualifier is often overlooked by developers to filter as its not so devastating as other characters. They are used for matching 0 or more characters and single character respectively.

$searhterm = mysql_real_escape_string(“%anything”); // still %anything
mysql_query(“SELECT * FROM messages WHERE subject LIKE ‘{$searchterm}%’”);

The intention of the query above is to search the contents matching user specified $searchterm.
In normal conditions the query will execute fast. But when entered a term with a leading % quantifier the query takes too long to perform as it can't find the index. It progressively goes slower as amount of data in table grows.
Same is the case with _ (underscore).
Although these are valid inputs, we need to filter them out. in PHP there is a function which actually excludes the terms specified.
Use addcslashes() for escaping the above characters:

$searchterm = addcslashes(mysql_real_escape_string(“%anything_”), “%_”); // $searchtearm == \%something\_
mysql_query(“SELECT * FROM messages WHERE subject LIKE ‘{$sub}%’”);

Here, the input is processed by the database’s prescribed escape function and is then filtered
through addcslashes() to escape all occurrences of % and _.

In case of my application it can be determined by the fact that entering % one or more times was causing the whole application to be non responsive for a longer time

Reference: http://dev.mysql.com/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Using an AirPcap device in Windows with Wireshark

Capturing wireless traffic in a Windows environment is unfortunately not as easy as a setting change. As with most Windows-based software, drivers in Windows are often not open source and do not allow for configuration change into monitor mode. With this in mind, we must use a specialized piece of hardware known as an AirPcap device. Once you have obtained an AirPcap device you will be required to install the software on the accompanying CD to your analysis computer. The configurable options include: • Interface - Select the device you are using for your capture here. Some advanced analysis scenarios may require you to use more than one AirPcap device to sniff simultaneously on multiple channels. • Blink LED - Clicking this button will make the LED lights on the AirPcap device blink. This is primarily used to identify the specific adapter you are using if you are using multiple AirPcap devices. • Channel - In this field, you select the channel you want AirPcap to listen on. Extension C...

Some one watching where you visited!

Yes... Mozilla has been susceptible to browser-history stealing java script code. Today, Giorgio posted some cool information about the exploit. Mozilla is already working on this. This bug has been reported. Actually they have set up a web site to show the proof-of-concept. Visit www.statrpanic.com in FF,Safari or Netscape and it will tell you which websites have you been already ! But I am not sure it will work in IE or not because my IE is not responding to the website. Clearing history of visited website makes you safe to this attack. I mean this is one way..may be there are other ways to exploit this. But I have found this effective. Try it yourself in FF and then in IE and see the results.

Hijacking SSL

SSL has been in centerstage of researches as well as attacks for quite long time. Last year in a conference in Germany researchers showed how to generate duplicate certificates exploiting MD5 hashing to break SSL. Later in Black Hat, Maxie showed how to exploit a field in SSL certificates to sign an own forged certificate to present it to the client. The main feature of this attack was that the client will never get any warning dialog box by the browser and subsequently the hacker doing an MITM can see the conversation between the client and server. The client will even get a PADLOCK sign to be assured that all things are going via encryption, but in reality it's not. Maxie released a tool SSLStrip to carry out these attacks. The tool has been used by many researchers around the world to carry out the attacks. They all used Unix machines as many open source utilities makes it easier to run the tool on it. My attempt was to run the tool on a Windows machine. It has been never easy t...