Skip to main content

Process listening on the ports

Some times it becomes very necessary to confirm which exe or process is listening upon which port in order to determine the reason behind the running services on those ports. For example, if you find that there is one more web service running over another port, suppose 8082 apart from port 80, you may need to determine, after all which process. To see it type:
netstat -anb:
If you see the above output, you can see the inetinfo.exe process is running on two ports 80 and 3205 which in turn are http and sapdp05 respectively. Also, the respective PID or processID, which in this case is 2644 for inetinfo.exe. So, if you stop or kill the inetinfo.exe process, these services will stop.

I have seen in some PCs, specially in Win7 netstat -ab command does not work. So for determining about the process listening on a specific port you can do like this:
type netstat -ano | find "2644" as we know that PID 2644 is responsible for opening the port 80 (http) and 3205 (sapdp05) but we exactly don't know the process name. So we can map them like the following picture:
The PID 2644 is mapped to inetinfo.exe in the Windows task manager. But if you want to just stop port 80 (or say, don't want the inetinfo.exe should listen on port 80, ie. http) you need to stop WWW Publishing into Services.msc. This will allow inetinfo.exe to tun on port no. 3205 (sapdp05) which may be a required service but stop http (port 80).

So this way you can determine how to check which exe or process is responsible for running a specific service on a specific port.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Using an AirPcap device in Windows with Wireshark

Capturing wireless traffic in a Windows environment is unfortunately not as easy as a setting change. As with most Windows-based software, drivers in Windows are often not open source and do not allow for configuration change into monitor mode. With this in mind, we must use a specialized piece of hardware known as an AirPcap device. Once you have obtained an AirPcap device you will be required to install the software on the accompanying CD to your analysis computer. The configurable options include: • Interface - Select the device you are using for your capture here. Some advanced analysis scenarios may require you to use more than one AirPcap device to sniff simultaneously on multiple channels. • Blink LED - Clicking this button will make the LED lights on the AirPcap device blink. This is primarily used to identify the specific adapter you are using if you are using multiple AirPcap devices. • Channel - In this field, you select the channel you want AirPcap to listen on. Extension C...

Anti CSRF header

Recently I came across an application which was preventing crsf attacks using a unique non-traditional approach. In traditional approach the csrf is thwarted by embedding unique random tokens, called nonce, in each sensitive page. But this application, which was making ajax calls and used jQuery, was creating a header to identify the valid and invalid requests altogether. The idea is to generate a custom header, x-session-token in this case, with every request which is considered sensitive and includes any sort of transaction. For example: xhr.setRequestHeader('x-session-token', csrf_token)   At the server level, server checks for this header if found request is fulfilled, otherwise rejected. We need to use xhr calls for making use of this technique, not useful in regular POST and GET requests. Since, I was not aware of this kind of countermeasures, probably, since most of the applications I did were using standard requests. So, I searched a bit and found even Go...

Some one watching where you visited!

Yes... Mozilla has been susceptible to browser-history stealing java script code. Today, Giorgio posted some cool information about the exploit. Mozilla is already working on this. This bug has been reported. Actually they have set up a web site to show the proof-of-concept. Visit www.statrpanic.com in FF,Safari or Netscape and it will tell you which websites have you been already ! But I am not sure it will work in IE or not because my IE is not responding to the website. Clearing history of visited website makes you safe to this attack. I mean this is one way..may be there are other ways to exploit this. But I have found this effective. Try it yourself in FF and then in IE and see the results.