Skip to main content

Certificate Pinning in mobile apps

What is certificate pinning:
Certificate pinning is an countermeasure to any attempt of MITM (Man in the middle) attacks where an attacker tries to inject his own certificate to sniff the traffic between the client and the server.

Why cert pinning is required:
The question here is why it's required for mobile apps, why not for browsers? The reason is mobile apps are very obscure and very difficult to get about what's going behind the scene. The end user does not get any warning from the app about any possible malicious activities going on. However in case of a browsers on desktops the user is presented with various warnings about TLS such as domain name not matching etc. This alerts the user to sense that something is not right there. And he has option to accept/ reject it , while in mobile apps it's not the case.

How to do it:
Generally it's done on code level, where the developer binds (pins) a certificate with the app. It's sort of hard coding the cert name, CA, domain name etc, so that the app does only connect if all the above are correct and not accept any other certificate even if there's a bit of difference.

Best practices:

  • Pinning the CA: Not a good idea. Many developers think that if they have pinned the app to a particular CA name, it's protected. It's true to some extent , but not entirely. Getting a CA certificate is not a big task for malicious attackers. The downside of this approach is that the app will connect to ANY certificate signed by the CA, thus defeating the purpose of certificate pinning.
  • Pinning the Intermediate CAs: Same as above so again not so effective
  • Pinning public key of the actual leaf (end) certificate: This is the most secure way of implementing the pinning the app. Rather than pinning CA/ Intermediate CA certificates, its recommended to pinning to the actual leaf certificate. Every certificate as a public key associated with the private key which could be pinned with the app. This approach makes sure that the app trusts the certificate which we pinned, not the the one which the attacker presents.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Using an AirPcap device in Windows with Wireshark

Capturing wireless traffic in a Windows environment is unfortunately not as easy as a setting change. As with most Windows-based software, drivers in Windows are often not open source and do not allow for configuration change into monitor mode. With this in mind, we must use a specialized piece of hardware known as an AirPcap device. Once you have obtained an AirPcap device you will be required to install the software on the accompanying CD to your analysis computer. The configurable options include: • Interface - Select the device you are using for your capture here. Some advanced analysis scenarios may require you to use more than one AirPcap device to sniff simultaneously on multiple channels. • Blink LED - Clicking this button will make the LED lights on the AirPcap device blink. This is primarily used to identify the specific adapter you are using if you are using multiple AirPcap devices. • Channel - In this field, you select the channel you want AirPcap to listen on. Extension C...
5 comments
Read more

Anti CSRF header

Recently I came across an application which was preventing crsf attacks using a unique non-traditional approach. In traditional approach the csrf is thwarted by embedding unique random tokens, called nonce, in each sensitive page. But this application, which was making ajax calls and used jQuery, was creating a header to identify the valid and invalid requests altogether. The idea is to generate a custom header, x-session-token in this case, with every request which is considered sensitive and includes any sort of transaction. For example: xhr.setRequestHeader('x-session-token', csrf_token)   At the server level, server checks for this header if found request is fulfilled, otherwise rejected. We need to use xhr calls for making use of this technique, not useful in regular POST and GET requests. Since, I was not aware of this kind of countermeasures, probably, since most of the applications I did were using standard requests. So, I searched a bit and found even Go...
4 comments
Read more

Some one watching where you visited!

Yes... Mozilla has been susceptible to browser-history stealing java script code. Today, Giorgio posted some cool information about the exploit. Mozilla is already working on this. This bug has been reported. Actually they have set up a web site to show the proof-of-concept. Visit www.statrpanic.com in FF,Safari or Netscape and it will tell you which websites have you been already ! But I am not sure it will work in IE or not because my IE is not responding to the website. Clearing history of visited website makes you safe to this attack. I mean this is one way..may be there are other ways to exploit this. But I have found this effective. Try it yourself in FF and then in IE and see the results.
Post a Comment
Read more