Skip to main content

Devise security with ESAPI in your application

The OWASP Enterprise Security API (ESAPI) Toolkits help software developers guard against security-related design and implementation flaws. Just as web applications and web services can be Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) enabled (PK-enabled) to perform for example certificate-based authentication, applications and services can be OWASP ESAPI-enabled (ES-enabled) to enable applications and services to protect themselves from attackers. Using an ESAPI Toolkit realizes cost savings through reduced development time, and the increased security due to using heavily analyzed and carefully designed security methods provide developers with a massive advantage over organizations that are trying to deal with security using existing ad hoc secure coding techniques. Available platforms, frameworks, and toolkits (Java EE, Struts, Spring, etc...) simply do not provide enough protection! ESAPI Toolkits are designed to automatically take care of many aspects of application security, making these issues invisible to the developers.
The use of the ESAPI will also make it much easier for static analysis tools to verify an application, by building ESAPI calls into static analysis tool rulesets.
It has been deveoped for various technologies like .NET, Java,PHP etc... Some are still good way from completion. The main idea behind the implementation of ESAPI is it gives you flexibility to use it against any language without caring about how they are receiving input and how they are filtreing it. Just use a method like ESAPI.endoeForHTML(input) and it will encode all the inputs taken by the application. The main difference between a normal encoding function and ESAPI encoding function is that the ESAPI functions are very well researched and carefully implemented .
For example,

methods for Authenticating a users are:

createUser(accountName, pass1, pass2)
generateStrongPassword()
getCurrentUser()
login(request, response)
logout()
verifyAccountNameStrength(acctName)
verifyPasswordStrength(newPass, oldPass)

Handling UesrAuthentication:



So,
Wrap your existing libraries and services
Extend and customize your ESAPI implementation
Fill in gaps with the reference implementation

Reference:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Using an AirPcap device in Windows with Wireshark

Capturing wireless traffic in a Windows environment is unfortunately not as easy as a setting change. As with most Windows-based software, drivers in Windows are often not open source and do not allow for configuration change into monitor mode. With this in mind, we must use a specialized piece of hardware known as an AirPcap device. Once you have obtained an AirPcap device you will be required to install the software on the accompanying CD to your analysis computer. The configurable options include: • Interface - Select the device you are using for your capture here. Some advanced analysis scenarios may require you to use more than one AirPcap device to sniff simultaneously on multiple channels. • Blink LED - Clicking this button will make the LED lights on the AirPcap device blink. This is primarily used to identify the specific adapter you are using if you are using multiple AirPcap devices. • Channel - In this field, you select the channel you want AirPcap to listen on. Extension C...

Some one watching where you visited!

Yes... Mozilla has been susceptible to browser-history stealing java script code. Today, Giorgio posted some cool information about the exploit. Mozilla is already working on this. This bug has been reported. Actually they have set up a web site to show the proof-of-concept. Visit www.statrpanic.com in FF,Safari or Netscape and it will tell you which websites have you been already ! But I am not sure it will work in IE or not because my IE is not responding to the website. Clearing history of visited website makes you safe to this attack. I mean this is one way..may be there are other ways to exploit this. But I have found this effective. Try it yourself in FF and then in IE and see the results.

Hijacking SSL

SSL has been in centerstage of researches as well as attacks for quite long time. Last year in a conference in Germany researchers showed how to generate duplicate certificates exploiting MD5 hashing to break SSL. Later in Black Hat, Maxie showed how to exploit a field in SSL certificates to sign an own forged certificate to present it to the client. The main feature of this attack was that the client will never get any warning dialog box by the browser and subsequently the hacker doing an MITM can see the conversation between the client and server. The client will even get a PADLOCK sign to be assured that all things are going via encryption, but in reality it's not. Maxie released a tool SSLStrip to carry out these attacks. The tool has been used by many researchers around the world to carry out the attacks. They all used Unix machines as many open source utilities makes it easier to run the tool on it. My attempt was to run the tool on a Windows machine. It has been never easy t...