Skip to main content

Man-In-The-Browser Malware

Have heard about the malware quite long time back but today I got a chance to study about it into one of the magazines (net-security.org). It's interesting, really amazing, a clever way to steal money from transactions without you sense anything suspicious happening.
Without going into technical details, this Man-In-The-Browser (MITB) Malware is known as 'URLZone'. In contrast to Man in the middle (MITM) attack where the communication is intercepted and changed in between client and server over the wire this MITB malware infects the client machine installs some exe's like unisntall02.exe on the client machine. It then sends back the ID to the Command and Control server that is used by the hacker.
How it works:
This is most interesting part which made me read the article till end.

It records for the requests which are going on POST and over https, which indicates that something valuable is being transferred.
When user makes the transaction the URLzone malware silently changes the recipients name with the hacker's name. All these can be defined into the configuration file of the malware.
The bank will see the request as genuine as the sessionID and other tokens will be valid and transfer the amount from the user to hacker's account.
Then it intercepts again the response from the bank and replace the hacker's name to the original recipient's name which the user/sender was expecting to see.
This is the brief overview of its functioning. For more you can refer to following magazine (reference):
http://www.net-security.org/dl/insecure/INSECURE-Mag-29.pdf
It's really interesting.



Comments

Vaibhav said…
I was thinking of the same but as a MITM keylogger..
But about malware i have one doubt here... banks are not so foolish to transfer money to other account directly they have NEFT and RTGS in place.
Manipulating account no may not work as todays internet banking of most of the banks have implemented a system to add the Payee (whom you are transfering the money)then the payee has to be confirmed by OTP (One time Password which is send by SMS or email)than only the transfer happens succesfully...


Wants your view on this... :)

Popular posts from this blog

Using an AirPcap device in Windows with Wireshark

Capturing wireless traffic in a Windows environment is unfortunately not as easy as a setting change. As with most Windows-based software, drivers in Windows are often not open source and do not allow for configuration change into monitor mode. With this in mind, we must use a specialized piece of hardware known as an AirPcap device. Once you have obtained an AirPcap device you will be required to install the software on the accompanying CD to your analysis computer. The configurable options include: • Interface - Select the device you are using for your capture here. Some advanced analysis scenarios may require you to use more than one AirPcap device to sniff simultaneously on multiple channels. • Blink LED - Clicking this button will make the LED lights on the AirPcap device blink. This is primarily used to identify the specific adapter you are using if you are using multiple AirPcap devices. • Channel - In this field, you select the channel you want AirPcap to listen on. Extension C...

Some one watching where you visited!

Yes... Mozilla has been susceptible to browser-history stealing java script code. Today, Giorgio posted some cool information about the exploit. Mozilla is already working on this. This bug has been reported. Actually they have set up a web site to show the proof-of-concept. Visit www.statrpanic.com in FF,Safari or Netscape and it will tell you which websites have you been already ! But I am not sure it will work in IE or not because my IE is not responding to the website. Clearing history of visited website makes you safe to this attack. I mean this is one way..may be there are other ways to exploit this. But I have found this effective. Try it yourself in FF and then in IE and see the results.

Hijacking SSL

SSL has been in centerstage of researches as well as attacks for quite long time. Last year in a conference in Germany researchers showed how to generate duplicate certificates exploiting MD5 hashing to break SSL. Later in Black Hat, Maxie showed how to exploit a field in SSL certificates to sign an own forged certificate to present it to the client. The main feature of this attack was that the client will never get any warning dialog box by the browser and subsequently the hacker doing an MITM can see the conversation between the client and server. The client will even get a PADLOCK sign to be assured that all things are going via encryption, but in reality it's not. Maxie released a tool SSLStrip to carry out these attacks. The tool has been used by many researchers around the world to carry out the attacks. They all used Unix machines as many open source utilities makes it easier to run the tool on it. My attempt was to run the tool on a Windows machine. It has been never easy t...