Skip to main content

SMTP Injection-Part I

Yet another injection attack! Same cause- Failure to validate user input. The application which I was assessing was almost injection free- means all the known issues like SQL Injection, XSS etc were not present until I found SMTP injection!

The application had one feedback/suggestion form, through which user can submit their comments. Typically, user-supplied input will be inserted into the SMTP conversation that the application server conducts with the mail server.
The form was having the following fields:
Your email address: Where user has to enter his email id
Subject: Enter the subject
Comments: User can put his comments
Entering the above information the user can submit the form by clicking on a nice Submit button. The mail will be fired to Admin of the website and few other stakeholders too.

So, for example if we specify the following:
Your email address: nileshkumar83@gmail.com
Subject: Flaws in the website
Comments: Your website has the lots of flaws that can be exploited..blah..blah.

Ideally clicking on Submit button should fire the email to Admin and few stakeholders not to anybody else!

Now suppose I inject the following in the Your email address field:
nileshkumar83@gmail.com%0aBcc:allotherpeople@thecompany.com

So this causes the mail command to generate the following headers:

To: admin@thecompany.com;stakeholder@thecompany.com
From: nileshkumar83@gmail.com
Bcc: allotherpeople@thecompany.com
Subject: Flaws in the website
Your website has the lots of flaws that can be exploited..blah..blah.

The %0a translated into new line and then follows Bcc command which send the mail to other people silently who are not directly concerned with the message.
So it may be used to create spam messages or malign anybody's image.
Another variant of the SMTP Injection is SMTP command injection in which can cause to create an entirely new message in which you can control the From headers as well. That is more dangerous. We'll talk about that in next part.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

File Upload through Null Byte Injection

Sometimes, during file upload we come across situation wherein there would be check on the file extension at the client side as well as server side too. If the application does allow only .jpeg extension to be uploaded, the client side java script checks for the extension of the file before passing the request. We all know that how easily this can be defeated. Some applications, checks for the extension at the server side also. That's not easy to bypass. However there are some ways with which it still can be bypassed. Most of server side scripts are written in high level languages such as Php, Java etc who still use some C/C++ libraries to read the file name and contents. That leads to the problem. In C/C++ a line ends with /00 or which is called Null Byte. So whenever the interpreter sees a null byte at the end of the a string, it stops reading thinking it has reached at the end of the string. This can be used for the bypass. It works for many servers, specially php servers. T...

'Information Leakage-Improper Error Handling' dropped

From Owasp Top 10 2010 List, the issue 'Information Leakage-Improper Error Handling' has been dropped. But it's not the final list,its child release actually. Bu I feel it shouldn't be set aside because its still the one of the prevalent issues these days. That's why I mailed to Dave Wicher: Hi Dave, Excellent work, Congrats! Just one little query- Don't you think that Information Leakage & Improper Error Handling still deserves to be in Top 10? Dave replied: This topic is clearly a very prevalent issue that deserves attention by most organizations. However, the typical impact of such a flaw is usually very low. Therefore, the overall risk of this type of flaw is lower than the other items in the top 10, which is why it was replaced in this update with one of the 2 new items. Regarding dropping Info Leak/Error handling - It is incredibly prevalent, no question. But their impact is typically very low, so the overall risk is low, which is why it fell out of t...

jtool - an alternative to otool

jtool comes with a capability of running on Linux environment. Some ipa scanning tools are created to run on Linux environment where mac environment is not available. In such cases tools such as otool and class-dump-z will not work. So jtool can be an alternative to otool. For more information on jtool please refer to http://www.newosxbook.com/tools/jtool.html . It lists down various commands which have same output as otool or a equivalent. There are several commands mentioned in link. But for our customized requirements and basis checks I have listed down the below ones after running on many binaries. The outputs are similar or equivalent to otool and class-dump-z: Commands for checking PIE flag (ASLR) in jTool jtool -d -v -arch | grep stack ·           Automatic Reference Counting (ARC) protection: jtool -d -v -arch | grep _objc_release ·           To check if the devic...