Skip to main content

HTTP Parameter Pollution


At the OWASP AppSec Europe, researchers demonstrated a very interesting otherwise underestimated issue. Although not a new attack category but quite dangerous if executed flawlessly.
It exploits the fact how does your application behaves when receives multiple parameters with same name in same URL.
For example, .../bank.php?action=view&accID=101&action=withdraw
In URL above two one parameter 'action' has multiple occurrences with same name in same URL.
What will the web application do? It can do one of the following depending on the environment it is using:
  • It may only take the data from the first parameter
  • It may take the data from the last parameter
  • It may take the data from all parameters and concatenate them together
Now we know that for the specific above URL the second action is quite dangerous!
Using this technique even WAF (Web Application Firewall) can be evaded, it won't filter the request.
Suppose a WAF is designed to detect and filter out attacks like SQL injection:
/index.aspx?q=select pass from table where id=101

The attacker now passes two parameters with same name 'q' then the query will be:

/index.aspx?q=select pass&q= from table where id=101

If a negative security filter is applying a regex that looks for say a SELECT followed by a FROM to each individual parameter value then it would miss this attack.

The best approach to this issue is to use automated learning/profiling of the web application to identify if multiple occurrences of parameters is normal or not. Most web application firewalls, for instance, gather basic meta-data characteristics of parameters such as the normal size of the payloads or the expected character sets used (digits only vs. alphanumeric, etc...). The top tier WAFs, however, also track if there are multiple occurrences. If an attacker then adds in duplicate parameter names, the WAF would be able to flag this anomaly and take appropriate action.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ardilla- New tool for finding SQL Injection and XSS

Three Researchers -- MIT's Adam Kiezun , Stanford's Philip Guo , and Syracuse University's Karthick Jayaraman -- has developed a new tool ' Ardilla ' that automatically finds and exploits SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities in Web applications. It creates inputs that pinpoint bugs in Web applications and then generates SQL injection and XSS attacks. But for now Ardilla is for PHP -based Web app only. The researchers say Ardilla found 68 never-before found vulnerabilities in five different PHP applications using the tool -- 23 SQL injection and 45 XSS flaws. More information is awaited. For their attack generation techniques refer to their document at: http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/mernst/pubs/create-attacks-tr054.pdf

Combining power of Fiddler with Burp

Both are pretty powerful tools when it comes to intercept and modify http communications. But at some point of time, they become even more powerful combo if tied with each other. They complement each other. In a recent pentest I came across a similar situation where in Burp was not able to intercept a specific kind of traffic and Fiddler came to rescue. The application was designed to upload video. The initial communication was straight forward, I mean logging into application, filling up the video details etc. And all these were easily captured by Burp except the point where you hit the Upload Video and it connects to a different server and surprisingly it was not captured by Burp, not sure why, even after repeated attempts. So, I fired Fiddler to see if the it sees this request. But it's a;ways to play with requests using Burp due to it's various functionalities like, Intruder, Repeaters etc. But it was necessary to capture this request in Burp. So the below steps can be

File Upload through Null Byte Injection

Sometimes, during file upload we come across situation wherein there would be check on the file extension at the client side as well as server side too. If the application does allow only .jpeg extension to be uploaded, the client side java script checks for the extension of the file before passing the request. We all know that how easily this can be defeated. Some applications, checks for the extension at the server side also. That's not easy to bypass. However there are some ways with which it still can be bypassed. Most of server side scripts are written in high level languages such as Php, Java etc who still use some C/C++ libraries to read the file name and contents. That leads to the problem. In C/C++ a line ends with /00 or which is called Null Byte. So whenever the interpreter sees a null byte at the end of the a string, it stops reading thinking it has reached at the end of the string. This can be used for the bypass. It works for many servers, specially php servers. T