Skip to main content

So, How will you work with a Proxy on NTLM...?

Most SharePoint environments today are using NTLM (the default) as the authentication protocol. NTLM authentication is a challenge-response scheme, consisting of three messages, commonly referred to as Type 1 (negotiation), Type 2 (challenge) and Type 3 (authentication). For more information on NTLM go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTLM as discussion over NTLM and its working in out of scope for this post.
The problem with setting up Web Proxies (Paros, Burp etc) is that they work fine with other types of authentication (Custom, Basic) but where there's NTLM is used the chain breaks between the proxy and the server resulting in non function of the application.
As soon as the proxy wants to connect to the server it gets the following '401:Unauthorized' response:
HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized Server: Microsoft-IIS/7.5 WWW-Authenticate: NTLM X-Powered-By: ASP.NET MicrosoftSharePointTeamServices: 14.0.0.4762 Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 06:38:22 GMT Content-Length: 0

You can't capture requests/responses through the proxies at all. I was also facing the same problem. Ronnie suggested me to use a tool which will sit between the proxy and application server. Which will handle all the NTLM communications between the proxy and the server...cool! The tool is called NTLMaps and can be downloaded here: http://ntlmaps.sourceforge.net/
'NTLM Authorization Proxy Server' (NTLMAPS) is a proxy software that allows you to authenticate via an MS Proxy Server using the proprietary NTLM protocol
Now the scenario was like this:

How to setup the chain:
1. Set the proxy server address in your browser to any port, lets say-localhost:8080

2. Set the Local proxy setting in the Web Proxy (Paros) as the same as you did for the browser so that the can communicate with each other on same port- localhost:8080
3. In Connection section of the Paros set the Outgoing proxy port no. as 5865. By default, the NTLMAPS tool runs on the same port. Now Paros will forward all requests obtained by browser to NTLMAPS at 5865.


4. Now start the NTLMAPS tool:

5. Now go to your browser and access the application. You will be able to capture request -response as usual as if you were working with custom authentications! The tool does the NTLM communications for you in the background without your knowing. You can see the communications also on the screen:



Happy Pentesting ! :)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

File Upload through Null Byte Injection

Sometimes, during file upload we come across situation wherein there would be check on the file extension at the client side as well as server side too. If the application does allow only .jpeg extension to be uploaded, the client side java script checks for the extension of the file before passing the request. We all know that how easily this can be defeated. Some applications, checks for the extension at the server side also. That's not easy to bypass. However there are some ways with which it still can be bypassed. Most of server side scripts are written in high level languages such as Php, Java etc who still use some C/C++ libraries to read the file name and contents. That leads to the problem. In C/C++ a line ends with /00 or which is called Null Byte. So whenever the interpreter sees a null byte at the end of the a string, it stops reading thinking it has reached at the end of the string. This can be used for the bypass. It works for many servers, specially php servers. T...
1 comment
Read more

'Information Leakage-Improper Error Handling' dropped

From Owasp Top 10 2010 List, the issue 'Information Leakage-Improper Error Handling' has been dropped. But it's not the final list,its child release actually. Bu I feel it shouldn't be set aside because its still the one of the prevalent issues these days. That's why I mailed to Dave Wicher: Hi Dave, Excellent work, Congrats! Just one little query- Don't you think that Information Leakage & Improper Error Handling still deserves to be in Top 10? Dave replied: This topic is clearly a very prevalent issue that deserves attention by most organizations. However, the typical impact of such a flaw is usually very low. Therefore, the overall risk of this type of flaw is lower than the other items in the top 10, which is why it was replaced in this update with one of the 2 new items. Regarding dropping Info Leak/Error handling - It is incredibly prevalent, no question. But their impact is typically very low, so the overall risk is low, which is why it fell out of t...
3 comments
Read more

jtool - an alternative to otool

jtool comes with a capability of running on Linux environment. Some ipa scanning tools are created to run on Linux environment where mac environment is not available. In such cases tools such as otool and class-dump-z will not work. So jtool can be an alternative to otool. For more information on jtool please refer to http://www.newosxbook.com/tools/jtool.html . It lists down various commands which have same output as otool or a equivalent. There are several commands mentioned in link. But for our customized requirements and basis checks I have listed down the below ones after running on many binaries. The outputs are similar or equivalent to otool and class-dump-z: Commands for checking PIE flag (ASLR) in jTool jtool -d -v -arch | grep stack ·           Automatic Reference Counting (ARC) protection: jtool -d -v -arch | grep _objc_release ·           To check if the devic...
1 comment
Read more