Skip to main content

How cookie can leak

Today I was having a chat with my friend Vaibhav about few vulnerabilities in one of the applications. In order of that he asked me it's really necessary to mark cookie as "Secure". Well, depends...if your whole application is on https then you should always go for "Secure" attribute. Cookies set with the "Secure" keyword will only be sent by the browser when connecting by a secure means (HTTPS). Apart from that there is no distinction - if "Secure" is absent, the cookie may be sent over an insecure connection.

We have seen a lot of cases where the cookie is leaked and sent over from https to http:

1. If your page contains mixed contents, ie. if you are including some links that is on http then the cookie may be leaked. For example, if your application uses url https://example.com and you are including someother links in the page using http://, the browser may warn you as "this page contains both secure and nonsecure items".

2. If you are visiting page with https:// link but you click on a third party link which is on http:// that may leak the cookies.

3. The browser may cache the cookies if not marked as secure.

So mainly there are 4 conditions:

* HTTP Cookie, with "Secure" will be returned only on HTTPS connections
* HTTPS Cookie, with "Secure" will be returned only on HTTPS connections
* HTTP Cookie, without "Secure" will be returned on HTTP or HTTPS connections
* HTTPS Cookie, without "Secure" will be returned on HTTP or HTTPS connections (could leak secure information)

So, HTTP Cookies can be read by HTTP or HTTPS. HTTPS Cookies can only be read by HTTPS, that is if you set Secure = True on the cookie.
Also how and when to setup "Secure" flag, you can visit my last posts-this and this

References:
http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2109/rfc2109
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2163828/can-cookies-set-using-http-be-read-using-https

Corrections,if any, is always appreciated!

Comments

Vaibhav said…
Hi Nilesh,

I had a discussion with the client and we came to the discussion that the application only has HTTPS port open i.e 443 and each and every request of the application goes through HTTPS as no HTTP port 80 is being used. Is it still necessary to secure the cookies.

So your point helped me to answer the question that "Non Secure cookies can be cached in the memory" :) and that helped me to push client to implement Secure TAG to all the cookie value.

Thanks
Vaibhav
March 11, 2011 at 7:20 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

File Upload through Null Byte Injection

Sometimes, during file upload we come across situation wherein there would be check on the file extension at the client side as well as server side too. If the application does allow only .jpeg extension to be uploaded, the client side java script checks for the extension of the file before passing the request. We all know that how easily this can be defeated. Some applications, checks for the extension at the server side also. That's not easy to bypass. However there are some ways with which it still can be bypassed. Most of server side scripts are written in high level languages such as Php, Java etc who still use some C/C++ libraries to read the file name and contents. That leads to the problem. In C/C++ a line ends with /00 or which is called Null Byte. So whenever the interpreter sees a null byte at the end of the a string, it stops reading thinking it has reached at the end of the string. This can be used for the bypass. It works for many servers, specially php servers. T...
1 comment
Read more

'Information Leakage-Improper Error Handling' dropped

From Owasp Top 10 2010 List, the issue 'Information Leakage-Improper Error Handling' has been dropped. But it's not the final list,its child release actually. Bu I feel it shouldn't be set aside because its still the one of the prevalent issues these days. That's why I mailed to Dave Wicher: Hi Dave, Excellent work, Congrats! Just one little query- Don't you think that Information Leakage & Improper Error Handling still deserves to be in Top 10? Dave replied: This topic is clearly a very prevalent issue that deserves attention by most organizations. However, the typical impact of such a flaw is usually very low. Therefore, the overall risk of this type of flaw is lower than the other items in the top 10, which is why it was replaced in this update with one of the 2 new items. Regarding dropping Info Leak/Error handling - It is incredibly prevalent, no question. But their impact is typically very low, so the overall risk is low, which is why it fell out of t...
3 comments
Read more

jtool - an alternative to otool

jtool comes with a capability of running on Linux environment. Some ipa scanning tools are created to run on Linux environment where mac environment is not available. In such cases tools such as otool and class-dump-z will not work. So jtool can be an alternative to otool. For more information on jtool please refer to http://www.newosxbook.com/tools/jtool.html . It lists down various commands which have same output as otool or a equivalent. There are several commands mentioned in link. But for our customized requirements and basis checks I have listed down the below ones after running on many binaries. The outputs are similar or equivalent to otool and class-dump-z: Commands for checking PIE flag (ASLR) in jTool jtool -d -v -arch | grep stack ·           Automatic Reference Counting (ARC) protection: jtool -d -v -arch | grep _objc_release ·           To check if the devic...
1 comment
Read more