Skip to main content

Few common web.xml misconfigurations-Part II

Well my colleague Sam says, I am slowing down on posts as I had written last one long time back :).
Here's my first in this month, second and concluding part of the last months series.
Few more mis-configurations:Refer-
4. SSL Not Configured:
No need to tell explicitly why SSL is necessary. Its protects the transit communications from sniffing,tampering by encrypting it and also-more important provides authentication. So confidentiality is preserved. Configure it as following:




5. Not marking Cookies as 'HTTPOnly':

Cookies marked with HTTPOnly ensures that the cookies can not be accessed by javascripts in browsers making it more safe against most of the and common Cross-Site Scripting attacks (XSS)-still possible with Cross Site Tracing (XST) attacks though.
Use the following configuration:


6. No Session Time-Out:

As a best pratcice for session management always set time-out for the applications. If the user is idle for some specific amount of time, invalidate the session that will make the application more secure against hijacking:


The application will expire after 10 minutes of inactivity. Don't set any -ve values as it will make the application to not expire indefinitely.

7. Don't use URL parameters to store sessionIDs:

Sessions can be stored in two places mainly: Cookies and URL parameters. The last one is less secure as URLs can be logged/cached in some places like browser history. Make sure than you store sessionIDs in cookies:



Sam said…
Nice job Nilesh. You should start compiling these into a collection that could be called "Nilesh's Greatest Hits" :)

Keep up the good work, and don't pay too much attention to that Sam guy. He's just giving you a hard time.
Anonymous said…
Hi Nilesh,

Can you please clarify that these configuration has to be done at container's level or can be handled at web application level?

Thanks & Regards
Suman Kumar
Nilesh Kumar said…
@Sam: Sure Sam, I shall make a collection of them and gift you on your next India visit :).

@Anonymous: It depends on your container level it should affect all the applications and at app level it will affect the particular web application for which you edit the web.xml file. Hope that helps.
Anonymous said…
Here is the original article published in Aug 2010. Plagiarism? Decide for yourself:
Nilesh Kumar said…
@Anonymous: Yes..correct!

Popular posts from this blog

Ardilla- New tool for finding SQL Injection and XSS

Three Researchers -- MIT's Adam Kiezun , Stanford's Philip Guo , and Syracuse University's Karthick Jayaraman -- has developed a new tool ' Ardilla ' that automatically finds and exploits SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities in Web applications. It creates inputs that pinpoint bugs in Web applications and then generates SQL injection and XSS attacks. But for now Ardilla is for PHP -based Web app only. The researchers say Ardilla found 68 never-before found vulnerabilities in five different PHP applications using the tool -- 23 SQL injection and 45 XSS flaws. More information is awaited. For their attack generation techniques refer to their document at:

Combining power of Fiddler with Burp

Both are pretty powerful tools when it comes to intercept and modify http communications. But at some point of time, they become even more powerful combo if tied with each other. They complement each other. In a recent pentest I came across a similar situation where in Burp was not able to intercept a specific kind of traffic and Fiddler came to rescue. The application was designed to upload video. The initial communication was straight forward, I mean logging into application, filling up the video details etc. And all these were easily captured by Burp except the point where you hit the Upload Video and it connects to a different server and surprisingly it was not captured by Burp, not sure why, even after repeated attempts. So, I fired Fiddler to see if the it sees this request. But it's a;ways to play with requests using Burp due to it's various functionalities like, Intruder, Repeaters etc. But it was necessary to capture this request in Burp. So the below steps can be

File Upload through Null Byte Injection

Sometimes, during file upload we come across situation wherein there would be check on the file extension at the client side as well as server side too. If the application does allow only .jpeg extension to be uploaded, the client side java script checks for the extension of the file before passing the request. We all know that how easily this can be defeated. Some applications, checks for the extension at the server side also. That's not easy to bypass. However there are some ways with which it still can be bypassed. Most of server side scripts are written in high level languages such as Php, Java etc who still use some C/C++ libraries to read the file name and contents. That leads to the problem. In C/C++ a line ends with /00 or which is called Null Byte. So whenever the interpreter sees a null byte at the end of the a string, it stops reading thinking it has reached at the end of the string. This can be used for the bypass. It works for many servers, specially php servers. T