Skip to main content

SMTP Injection-Part I

Yet another injection attack! Same cause- Failure to validate user input. The application which I was assessing was almost injection free- means all the known issues like SQL Injection, XSS etc were not present until I found SMTP injection!

The application had one feedback/suggestion form, through which user can submit their comments. Typically, user-supplied input will be inserted into the SMTP conversation that the application server conducts with the mail server.
The form was having the following fields:
Your email address: Where user has to enter his email id
Subject: Enter the subject
Comments: User can put his comments
Entering the above information the user can submit the form by clicking on a nice Submit button. The mail will be fired to Admin of the website and few other stakeholders too.

So, for example if we specify the following:
Your email address: nileshkumar83@gmail.com
Subject: Flaws in the website
Comments: Your website has the lots of flaws that can be exploited..blah..blah.

Ideally clicking on Submit button should fire the email to Admin and few stakeholders not to anybody else!

Now suppose I inject the following in the Your email address field:
nileshkumar83@gmail.com%0aBcc:allotherpeople@thecompany.com

So this causes the mail command to generate the following headers:

To: admin@thecompany.com;stakeholder@thecompany.com
From: nileshkumar83@gmail.com
Bcc: allotherpeople@thecompany.com
Subject: Flaws in the website
Your website has the lots of flaws that can be exploited..blah..blah.

The %0a translated into new line and then follows Bcc command which send the mail to other people silently who are not directly concerned with the message.
So it may be used to create spam messages or malign anybody's image.
Another variant of the SMTP Injection is SMTP command injection in which can cause to create an entirely new message in which you can control the From headers as well. That is more dangerous. We'll talk about that in next part.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ardilla- New tool for finding SQL Injection and XSS

Three Researchers -- MIT's Adam Kiezun , Stanford's Philip Guo , and Syracuse University's Karthick Jayaraman -- has developed a new tool ' Ardilla ' that automatically finds and exploits SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities in Web applications. It creates inputs that pinpoint bugs in Web applications and then generates SQL injection and XSS attacks. But for now Ardilla is for PHP -based Web app only. The researchers say Ardilla found 68 never-before found vulnerabilities in five different PHP applications using the tool -- 23 SQL injection and 45 XSS flaws. More information is awaited. For their attack generation techniques refer to their document at: http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/mernst/pubs/create-attacks-tr054.pdf

File Upload through Null Byte Injection

Sometimes, during file upload we come across situation wherein there would be check on the file extension at the client side as well as server side too. If the application does allow only .jpeg extension to be uploaded, the client side java script checks for the extension of the file before passing the request. We all know that how easily this can be defeated. Some applications, checks for the extension at the server side also. That's not easy to bypass. However there are some ways with which it still can be bypassed. Most of server side scripts are written in high level languages such as Php, Java etc who still use some C/C++ libraries to read the file name and contents. That leads to the problem. In C/C++ a line ends with /00 or which is called Null Byte. So whenever the interpreter sees a null byte at the end of the a string, it stops reading thinking it has reached at the end of the string. This can be used for the bypass. It works for many servers, specially php servers. T

Combining power of Fiddler with Burp

Both are pretty powerful tools when it comes to intercept and modify http communications. But at some point of time, they become even more powerful combo if tied with each other. They complement each other. In a recent pentest I came across a similar situation where in Burp was not able to intercept a specific kind of traffic and Fiddler came to rescue. The application was designed to upload video. The initial communication was straight forward, I mean logging into application, filling up the video details etc. And all these were easily captured by Burp except the point where you hit the Upload Video and it connects to a different server and surprisingly it was not captured by Burp, not sure why, even after repeated attempts. So, I fired Fiddler to see if the it sees this request. But it's a;ways to play with requests using Burp due to it's various functionalities like, Intruder, Repeaters etc. But it was necessary to capture this request in Burp. So the below steps can be