Skip to main content

Use SSH-Reject Telenet,RSH/RLogin

The main problem with Telnet/rsh/rlogin/rcp is that they send the information over the wire unencrypted. So whatever you type, your username/passwords that go in clear text over the wire. Anybody can sniff it and make your life difficult. The remote shell utilities such as, rsh, depend on a pre authenticated IP connection. Anything coming from that IP is reliable for them. IP spoofing is not difficult!
So use SSH, Secure way to send information over network.The Secure Shell keeps unauthorized users out of our computers, both by encrypting passwords to protect them from sniffing, and by providing more positive authentication than simple password exchange. Instead of rsh, rcp, and rlogin, simply use the commands ssh, scp, or slogin.
How to tunnel Telnet through SSH:
1. Launch Putty and provide the destination host IP address.
2. Go to SSH->Tunnel.Enter the destination server name or address followed by a colon and the port PuTTY will forward to.


3.Click on the Open button. A terminal window will and prompt you to logon to the remote host using SSH. Enter your name and password to login to the remote host.
4.Now you can connect to this server using any non secure Telnet client. You must note here that you have to connect to the same port which is specified for the destination server in step 2.

Comments

Ritesh said…
SSH tunneling is very useful indeed! It's even easier to set up if you have a Cygwin shell or are using a *nix system.
At the command prompt (cygwin or bash)
# ssh -L 3001:localhost:23 user@domain.com

If you've gone through the trouble of creating a key pair you can get avoid having to enter the password each time you set up the tunnel.

SSH tunneling is even more useful as a tool to bypass restrictive proxies. If you use dynamic tunneling, you can effectively create a SOCKS proxy. For example if you did this:
# ssh -D 8080 user@domain.com

You can now set up your browser to use localhost:8080 as a SOCKS proxy, allowing you to tunnel everything through it. For maximum security you can enable remote DNS lookups in your browser(Firefox has this setting under about:config) so that your browser does not use the default DNS server for name lookups.

Popular posts from this blog

Ardilla- New tool for finding SQL Injection and XSS

Three Researchers -- MIT's Adam Kiezun , Stanford's Philip Guo , and Syracuse University's Karthick Jayaraman -- has developed a new tool ' Ardilla ' that automatically finds and exploits SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities in Web applications. It creates inputs that pinpoint bugs in Web applications and then generates SQL injection and XSS attacks. But for now Ardilla is for PHP -based Web app only. The researchers say Ardilla found 68 never-before found vulnerabilities in five different PHP applications using the tool -- 23 SQL injection and 45 XSS flaws. More information is awaited. For their attack generation techniques refer to their document at: http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/mernst/pubs/create-attacks-tr054.pdf

File Upload through Null Byte Injection

Sometimes, during file upload we come across situation wherein there would be check on the file extension at the client side as well as server side too. If the application does allow only .jpeg extension to be uploaded, the client side java script checks for the extension of the file before passing the request. We all know that how easily this can be defeated. Some applications, checks for the extension at the server side also. That's not easy to bypass. However there are some ways with which it still can be bypassed. Most of server side scripts are written in high level languages such as Php, Java etc who still use some C/C++ libraries to read the file name and contents. That leads to the problem. In C/C++ a line ends with /00 or which is called Null Byte. So whenever the interpreter sees a null byte at the end of the a string, it stops reading thinking it has reached at the end of the string. This can be used for the bypass. It works for many servers, specially php servers. T

Combining power of Fiddler with Burp

Both are pretty powerful tools when it comes to intercept and modify http communications. But at some point of time, they become even more powerful combo if tied with each other. They complement each other. In a recent pentest I came across a similar situation where in Burp was not able to intercept a specific kind of traffic and Fiddler came to rescue. The application was designed to upload video. The initial communication was straight forward, I mean logging into application, filling up the video details etc. And all these were easily captured by Burp except the point where you hit the Upload Video and it connects to a different server and surprisingly it was not captured by Burp, not sure why, even after repeated attempts. So, I fired Fiddler to see if the it sees this request. But it's a;ways to play with requests using Burp due to it's various functionalities like, Intruder, Repeaters etc. But it was necessary to capture this request in Burp. So the below steps can be