Skip to main content

Salted hash implementation in Login, in nutshell



The best approach would be hashing the passwords, instead of encrypting them as key management becomes an issue.

Benefits of passwords in form of salted hash:
·         Real passwords are never stored/ displayed/ logged in the system
·         Salts makes dictionary attack very impractical as it’s very difficult to generate    re-computed hash table as salts are random
·         It’s easier to implement as no need of key management

A general approach would be like this (when storing):
·         Generate a long random salt using cryptographically strong functions such as SecureRandom in Java, when user is first time registering himself
·         Use the above salt and hash it with the user’s chosen password using standard and strong hashing algos like SHA 256
·         Now strore the Username, salted hash and respective salt in DB

When retrieving (authenticating user):
·         When the user submits his username-password, retrieve the user’s corresponding salt
·         Concatenate the salt with the user supplied password and apply the same hashing algo (SHA 256) and compute the salted hash
·         Now compare the newly computed salted hash with already stored salted hash against the username
·         If they match, let him in otherwise throw a generic login error, such as ‘Invalid Credentials’

Client side vs. Server side:
·         Always do hashing on server side, irrespective of client side hashing
·         The issue with client side hashing is , even it’s not in clear text, it is as good as a clear text password
·         If you do client side hashing, you need to depend on Javascript, which sometimes is disabled by user, or some browsers may not execute properly
·         Client side hashing is not replacement for TLS/ SSL. Protect all sensitive pages, such as login page over SSL

Constraint:
·         You may not be able to recover user’s original password, if user forgets it as the passwords are not in clear text. You can just users to update with a new password

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Using an AirPcap device in Windows with Wireshark

Capturing wireless traffic in a Windows environment is unfortunately not as easy as a setting change. As with most Windows-based software, drivers in Windows are often not open source and do not allow for configuration change into monitor mode. With this in mind, we must use a specialized piece of hardware known as an AirPcap device. Once you have obtained an AirPcap device you will be required to install the software on the accompanying CD to your analysis computer. The configurable options include: • Interface - Select the device you are using for your capture here. Some advanced analysis scenarios may require you to use more than one AirPcap device to sniff simultaneously on multiple channels. • Blink LED - Clicking this button will make the LED lights on the AirPcap device blink. This is primarily used to identify the specific adapter you are using if you are using multiple AirPcap devices. • Channel - In this field, you select the channel you want AirPcap to listen on. Extension C...

Anti CSRF header

Recently I came across an application which was preventing crsf attacks using a unique non-traditional approach. In traditional approach the csrf is thwarted by embedding unique random tokens, called nonce, in each sensitive page. But this application, which was making ajax calls and used jQuery, was creating a header to identify the valid and invalid requests altogether. The idea is to generate a custom header, x-session-token in this case, with every request which is considered sensitive and includes any sort of transaction. For example: xhr.setRequestHeader('x-session-token', csrf_token)   At the server level, server checks for this header if found request is fulfilled, otherwise rejected. We need to use xhr calls for making use of this technique, not useful in regular POST and GET requests. Since, I was not aware of this kind of countermeasures, probably, since most of the applications I did were using standard requests. So, I searched a bit and found even Go...

Some one watching where you visited!

Yes... Mozilla has been susceptible to browser-history stealing java script code. Today, Giorgio posted some cool information about the exploit. Mozilla is already working on this. This bug has been reported. Actually they have set up a web site to show the proof-of-concept. Visit www.statrpanic.com in FF,Safari or Netscape and it will tell you which websites have you been already ! But I am not sure it will work in IE or not because my IE is not responding to the website. Clearing history of visited website makes you safe to this attack. I mean this is one way..may be there are other ways to exploit this. But I have found this effective. Try it yourself in FF and then in IE and see the results.