Skip to main content

Certificate Pinning in mobile apps

What is certificate pinning:
Certificate pinning is an countermeasure to any attempt of MITM (Man in the middle) attacks where an attacker tries to inject his own certificate to sniff the traffic between the client and the server.

Why cert pinning is required:
The question here is why it's required for mobile apps, why not for browsers? The reason is mobile apps are very obscure and very difficult to get about what's going behind the scene. The end user does not get any warning from the app about any possible malicious activities going on. However in case of a browsers on desktops the user is presented with various warnings about TLS such as domain name not matching etc. This alerts the user to sense that something is not right there. And he has option to accept/ reject it , while in mobile apps it's not the case.

How to do it:
Generally it's done on code level, where the developer binds (pins) a certificate with the app. It's sort of hard coding the cert name, CA, domain name etc, so that the app does only connect if all the above are correct and not accept any other certificate even if there's a bit of difference.

Best practices:

  • Pinning the CA: Not a good idea. Many developers think that if they have pinned the app to a particular CA name, it's protected. It's true to some extent , but not entirely. Getting a CA certificate is not a big task for malicious attackers. The downside of this approach is that the app will connect to ANY certificate signed by the CA, thus defeating the purpose of certificate pinning.
  • Pinning the Intermediate CAs: Same as above so again not so effective
  • Pinning public key of the actual leaf (end) certificate: This is the most secure way of implementing the pinning the app. Rather than pinning CA/ Intermediate CA certificates, its recommended to pinning to the actual leaf certificate. Every certificate as a public key associated with the private key which could be pinned with the app. This approach makes sure that the app trusts the certificate which we pinned, not the the one which the attacker presents.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

File Upload through Null Byte Injection

Sometimes, during file upload we come across situation wherein there would be check on the file extension at the client side as well as server side too. If the application does allow only .jpeg extension to be uploaded, the client side java script checks for the extension of the file before passing the request. We all know that how easily this can be defeated. Some applications, checks for the extension at the server side also. That's not easy to bypass. However there are some ways with which it still can be bypassed. Most of server side scripts are written in high level languages such as Php, Java etc who still use some C/C++ libraries to read the file name and contents. That leads to the problem. In C/C++ a line ends with /00 or which is called Null Byte. So whenever the interpreter sees a null byte at the end of the a string, it stops reading thinking it has reached at the end of the string. This can be used for the bypass. It works for many servers, specially php servers. T...
1 comment
Read more

'Information Leakage-Improper Error Handling' dropped

From Owasp Top 10 2010 List, the issue 'Information Leakage-Improper Error Handling' has been dropped. But it's not the final list,its child release actually. Bu I feel it shouldn't be set aside because its still the one of the prevalent issues these days. That's why I mailed to Dave Wicher: Hi Dave, Excellent work, Congrats! Just one little query- Don't you think that Information Leakage & Improper Error Handling still deserves to be in Top 10? Dave replied: This topic is clearly a very prevalent issue that deserves attention by most organizations. However, the typical impact of such a flaw is usually very low. Therefore, the overall risk of this type of flaw is lower than the other items in the top 10, which is why it was replaced in this update with one of the 2 new items. Regarding dropping Info Leak/Error handling - It is incredibly prevalent, no question. But their impact is typically very low, so the overall risk is low, which is why it fell out of t...
3 comments
Read more

jtool - an alternative to otool

jtool comes with a capability of running on Linux environment. Some ipa scanning tools are created to run on Linux environment where mac environment is not available. In such cases tools such as otool and class-dump-z will not work. So jtool can be an alternative to otool. For more information on jtool please refer to http://www.newosxbook.com/tools/jtool.html . It lists down various commands which have same output as otool or a equivalent. There are several commands mentioned in link. But for our customized requirements and basis checks I have listed down the below ones after running on many binaries. The outputs are similar or equivalent to otool and class-dump-z: Commands for checking PIE flag (ASLR) in jTool jtool -d -v -arch | grep stack ·           Automatic Reference Counting (ARC) protection: jtool -d -v -arch | grep _objc_release ·           To check if the devic...
1 comment
Read more