Skip to main content

Touch ID auth - a boon or bane?

With advancement of technology, applications are moving towards modern way of authentication from a traditional one. More and more biometric based authentication are being used apart from the password based. One of such example would be- Touch ID. Touch ID uses users' fingerprint to authenticate the user to device/ app.

How does it work- On a high level, when a user registers to choose to authenticate to his phone using his/ her fingerprints, the fingerprints are gets stored on the device in form of hashes. Next time when user tries authenticate self and submits his/ her fingerprints, the device matches the submitted fingerprint hash with the ones with already stored and takes decision whether to authenticate him/ her or not.

Sounds good, but what's the issue- It's a very convenient technology to open the phone with just a mild touch of your fingerprint. No need to remember/ change/ maintain PIN or passwords. It's more secure because it's completely unique, and it does not suffer from security issues which traditional ones suffer- guessing, brute-force, stealing etc.
Now, another side of the coin- security. How secure it is- it's pretty secure- till there's only one user registered. How about multi-user registration on same device- eg, husband and wife.
Now again, how about the apps using the Touch ID as an authentication- As mentioned above, one user, it's fine. Multi-user, if all are intended user of the app, again fine. But if not- in cases where if two friends have registered on the same phone to use it as a common phone to use all the apps- except sensitive ones such as banking apps. Each of the friends can access each other's account- sounds scary? Let's replace friends with acquaintances.

Many apps don't take care of the above scenarios. A trusted friend-turned-disgruntled steals the the phone and authenticates him/ her self to access other's account. Or, in a complex case, the phone is stolen by a third person, roots it ad replays the touch id tokens. Most of the apps have MFA- muti factor authentication- such as SMS OTP- but these are effective against traditional password based remote attacks. But not in this scenario- because the phone is already in attacker's possession and the SMS OTP would be received on the same device, defeating purpose of MFA. 

So there has to be some limitation/ controls on use of Touch ID authentication so that there's a fine balance between usability vs security. A few approaches are discussed below:

  • For the apps using Touch ID must take extra care on what to display and what not 'be default'. One default case would be just showing account summary/ balances. 
  • If someone try to gets past that screen, another form of MFA which is out-of-band which is not delivered on the same device must be used. Examples would be, hardware tokens. SMS OTP on same device is not an effective control.
  • Supplemented by account login passwords/ soft tokens, which are unknown to the attacker
  • Clearly devise a policy as what kind of transactions are protected by which control. For example, for High risk transactions, we need to have hardware tokens or randomly generated soft tokens protected by a static PIN which is only known to the legitimate user. Needless to say all of should be validated on server side.
All of the approached can be used in order to achieve mix and match between usability and security.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Using an AirPcap device in Windows with Wireshark

Capturing wireless traffic in a Windows environment is unfortunately not as easy as a setting change. As with most Windows-based software, drivers in Windows are often not open source and do not allow for configuration change into monitor mode. With this in mind, we must use a specialized piece of hardware known as an AirPcap device. Once you have obtained an AirPcap device you will be required to install the software on the accompanying CD to your analysis computer. The configurable options include: • Interface - Select the device you are using for your capture here. Some advanced analysis scenarios may require you to use more than one AirPcap device to sniff simultaneously on multiple channels. • Blink LED - Clicking this button will make the LED lights on the AirPcap device blink. This is primarily used to identify the specific adapter you are using if you are using multiple AirPcap devices. • Channel - In this field, you select the channel you want AirPcap to listen on. Extension C...
5 comments
Read more

Anti CSRF header

Recently I came across an application which was preventing crsf attacks using a unique non-traditional approach. In traditional approach the csrf is thwarted by embedding unique random tokens, called nonce, in each sensitive page. But this application, which was making ajax calls and used jQuery, was creating a header to identify the valid and invalid requests altogether. The idea is to generate a custom header, x-session-token in this case, with every request which is considered sensitive and includes any sort of transaction. For example: xhr.setRequestHeader('x-session-token', csrf_token)   At the server level, server checks for this header if found request is fulfilled, otherwise rejected. We need to use xhr calls for making use of this technique, not useful in regular POST and GET requests. Since, I was not aware of this kind of countermeasures, probably, since most of the applications I did were using standard requests. So, I searched a bit and found even Go...
4 comments
Read more

Some one watching where you visited!

Yes... Mozilla has been susceptible to browser-history stealing java script code. Today, Giorgio posted some cool information about the exploit. Mozilla is already working on this. This bug has been reported. Actually they have set up a web site to show the proof-of-concept. Visit www.statrpanic.com in FF,Safari or Netscape and it will tell you which websites have you been already ! But I am not sure it will work in IE or not because my IE is not responding to the website. Clearing history of visited website makes you safe to this attack. I mean this is one way..may be there are other ways to exploit this. But I have found this effective. Try it yourself in FF and then in IE and see the results.
Post a Comment
Read more