Skip to main content

So how do you steal credential in memory in mobile?

It's not a technical question, it's a question when a few people argue (devil's advocate) that even if their app has an issue of storing the 'Login Credentials' in memory, what's the risk? Their arguments are:

  • They have jailbreak/ root detection implemented. So the app cannot be installed on a rooted device.
  • >>Counter argument: The JB/ root detection are completely by-passable as they are client side protections. Scenarios, a user can intentionally/ unintentionally bypass this check and install at his own device to enjoy banking and other apps also, which require a root. Second scenario, a security researcher can do the same thing to do a research and learn how this app works. If this app belongs to a reputed firm and he/ she makes this finding public, it would be reputation loss.
  • If you try to root the device which has the app already installed, the device will reboot and in this order kills the app's process and consequently clears the memory which holds the credentials.
  • >>Counter argument: There are a few malicious apps/ incidents we have come across where it's not really needed to reboot the device. The malwares/ exploits can take advantage of various CVEs to gain root access to the device which can be used to further dump/ read the memory.      Not possible? There are bunch of links on the internet which suggests it's possible- a few old, a few current. They range from malware to Remote access trojans. A few links:
  • https://blog.trendmicro.com/trendlabs-security-intelligence/new-androrat-exploits-dated-permanent-rooting-vulnerability-allows-privilege-escalation/ 
  • https://blog.trendmicro.com/trendlabs-security-intelligence/godless-mobile-malware-uses-multiple-exploits-root-devices/

The point here there could be N no. of possibilities to exploit something, if not today, maybe in near future. That does not mean, we'll not fix our problem and rather challenge others to prove that it's not possible. If that's the case, we need not develop secure applications just because there are so many perimeter defense available on the network? That's security through obscurity, which is bound to fail one fine day!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

File Upload through Null Byte Injection

Sometimes, during file upload we come across situation wherein there would be check on the file extension at the client side as well as server side too. If the application does allow only .jpeg extension to be uploaded, the client side java script checks for the extension of the file before passing the request. We all know that how easily this can be defeated. Some applications, checks for the extension at the server side also. That's not easy to bypass. However there are some ways with which it still can be bypassed. Most of server side scripts are written in high level languages such as Php, Java etc who still use some C/C++ libraries to read the file name and contents. That leads to the problem. In C/C++ a line ends with /00 or which is called Null Byte. So whenever the interpreter sees a null byte at the end of the a string, it stops reading thinking it has reached at the end of the string. This can be used for the bypass. It works for many servers, specially php servers. T...
1 comment
Read more

'Information Leakage-Improper Error Handling' dropped

From Owasp Top 10 2010 List, the issue 'Information Leakage-Improper Error Handling' has been dropped. But it's not the final list,its child release actually. Bu I feel it shouldn't be set aside because its still the one of the prevalent issues these days. That's why I mailed to Dave Wicher: Hi Dave, Excellent work, Congrats! Just one little query- Don't you think that Information Leakage & Improper Error Handling still deserves to be in Top 10? Dave replied: This topic is clearly a very prevalent issue that deserves attention by most organizations. However, the typical impact of such a flaw is usually very low. Therefore, the overall risk of this type of flaw is lower than the other items in the top 10, which is why it was replaced in this update with one of the 2 new items. Regarding dropping Info Leak/Error handling - It is incredibly prevalent, no question. But their impact is typically very low, so the overall risk is low, which is why it fell out of t...
3 comments
Read more

jtool - an alternative to otool

jtool comes with a capability of running on Linux environment. Some ipa scanning tools are created to run on Linux environment where mac environment is not available. In such cases tools such as otool and class-dump-z will not work. So jtool can be an alternative to otool. For more information on jtool please refer to http://www.newosxbook.com/tools/jtool.html . It lists down various commands which have same output as otool or a equivalent. There are several commands mentioned in link. But for our customized requirements and basis checks I have listed down the below ones after running on many binaries. The outputs are similar or equivalent to otool and class-dump-z: Commands for checking PIE flag (ASLR) in jTool jtool -d -v -arch | grep stack ·           Automatic Reference Counting (ARC) protection: jtool -d -v -arch | grep _objc_release ·           To check if the devic...
1 comment
Read more