Skip to main content

Dealing with Non-technical users

In Security profession, you always go with your finding to the people who has technical capabilities so that they may understand, what you want to explain to them. But what in a situation if you need to deal with ordinary, non technical users? They don't understand your security jargon, they only care about their business. I have been dealing with these sort people from long back! And when they are sitting in remote location, it's very tough!
The best way is to send them mails explaining the issue, its impact and how to fix them. Sometimes, they will co-operate with you some times, you are disappointed.
For example, if you need to deal with users running any Insecure Services (suppose FTP) on their machines, the following ways seem working:
1. First send a communication to them about the issue, eg, what the service is all about, how it could be exploited if not closed or secured.
2. If they respond, well, tell them to stop FTP from Services.msc.
3. Sometimes, they are not sure why FTP is running on their machine. They stop IIS admin and all, but FTP still running. Tell them to run fport, a McAfee tool to find the EXE which is responsible for running the service. netstat -ab is another equivalent command. Sometimes Inetinfo.exe may not be responsible for running FTP on your machine as there are lots of other application, which may run their own FTP servers.
4. Now you are sure, which process (EXE) is running the service, you may instruct the user to go and locate that service into Services.msc and stop it.

What, I want to say is , it really takes to be patient at your side, if users are non-technical, remote and a little non-cooperative. But again, its very necessary to take them to right way as they may pose a security risk to your organization.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ardilla- New tool for finding SQL Injection and XSS

Three Researchers -- MIT's Adam Kiezun , Stanford's Philip Guo , and Syracuse University's Karthick Jayaraman -- has developed a new tool ' Ardilla ' that automatically finds and exploits SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities in Web applications. It creates inputs that pinpoint bugs in Web applications and then generates SQL injection and XSS attacks. But for now Ardilla is for PHP -based Web app only. The researchers say Ardilla found 68 never-before found vulnerabilities in five different PHP applications using the tool -- 23 SQL injection and 45 XSS flaws. More information is awaited. For their attack generation techniques refer to their document at: http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/mernst/pubs/create-attacks-tr054.pdf

Combining power of Fiddler with Burp

Both are pretty powerful tools when it comes to intercept and modify http communications. But at some point of time, they become even more powerful combo if tied with each other. They complement each other. In a recent pentest I came across a similar situation where in Burp was not able to intercept a specific kind of traffic and Fiddler came to rescue. The application was designed to upload video. The initial communication was straight forward, I mean logging into application, filling up the video details etc. And all these were easily captured by Burp except the point where you hit the Upload Video and it connects to a different server and surprisingly it was not captured by Burp, not sure why, even after repeated attempts. So, I fired Fiddler to see if the it sees this request. But it's a;ways to play with requests using Burp due to it's various functionalities like, Intruder, Repeaters etc. But it was necessary to capture this request in Burp. So the below steps can be

File Upload through Null Byte Injection

Sometimes, during file upload we come across situation wherein there would be check on the file extension at the client side as well as server side too. If the application does allow only .jpeg extension to be uploaded, the client side java script checks for the extension of the file before passing the request. We all know that how easily this can be defeated. Some applications, checks for the extension at the server side also. That's not easy to bypass. However there are some ways with which it still can be bypassed. Most of server side scripts are written in high level languages such as Php, Java etc who still use some C/C++ libraries to read the file name and contents. That leads to the problem. In C/C++ a line ends with /00 or which is called Null Byte. So whenever the interpreter sees a null byte at the end of the a string, it stops reading thinking it has reached at the end of the string. This can be used for the bypass. It works for many servers, specially php servers. T