Skip to main content

Securing Connection Strings

Today, again I came across the same scenario about which my colleague Sam had asked me once. He asked me about best practices for securing the connection strings. Well, for securing the Database connection string file. The general approach will be-irrespective of technology- its’ best practice to move the credentials out of source-code into a configuration file. It needs to be properly protected, using strong ACLs and strong encryption with properly protected keys. I shall give you an example of .NET which I am aware of and you can suggest developers to use the similar thing for Oracle and jsp pages.

Again there are different approaches for different technologies- for ASP.Net you can either use Windows authentication instead of using username/password, database (connection string) name in the source code. But that’s not possible, if you have got to mention the username/password, database name, put them in a separate configuration file such as app.config or web.config and encrypt them using various ways available in .NET such as, protected configuration:
The following configuration file fragment shows the connectionStrings section after it has been encrypted:

<connectionStrings configProtectionProvider="DataProtectionConfigurationProvider">
<CipherValue>AHHJHJh9w+++kdjkdkUIosdndns…. </CipherValue>

When the encrypted connection string is retrieved at run time, the .NET Framework uses the specified provider to decrypt the CipherValue and make it available to your application. You do not need to write any additional code to manage the decryption process.
The bottom line is that don’t store them in source code and you have to encrypt the configuration file containing connection string. Tell them to put the connection string in configuration file and encrypt it. Again, they have to pay attention to key management. This is the best available solution however, it may be tailored as per the their needs.

His other query was about SSL if that can be used to connections between application and database servers.
Here there are two scenarios, first the app server and database server are on the same machine. In case of protecting connection between application server and database server doesn’t make any sense as the connection is not exposed to the public. Also, the application server and DB server both can be on same machine or separate machines. SSL is only used between application server/DB server machine and user browser to prevent Man in the Middle attacks like sniffing.
In worst case, if application server gets compromised (application vulnerabilities may be main culprit) SSL won’t do anything as the connection string if not encrypted can be easily read by the hacker.

Regarding the second scenario,one situation I may think of, if the both app server and DB server are on different sites. But in that case also, only the connection string credentials in transit can be protected with SSL, can’t be protected when app server is compromised.
The best bet is to encrypt the connection string file itself.


Popular posts from this blog

Ardilla- New tool for finding SQL Injection and XSS

Three Researchers -- MIT's Adam Kiezun , Stanford's Philip Guo , and Syracuse University's Karthick Jayaraman -- has developed a new tool ' Ardilla ' that automatically finds and exploits SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities in Web applications. It creates inputs that pinpoint bugs in Web applications and then generates SQL injection and XSS attacks. But for now Ardilla is for PHP -based Web app only. The researchers say Ardilla found 68 never-before found vulnerabilities in five different PHP applications using the tool -- 23 SQL injection and 45 XSS flaws. More information is awaited. For their attack generation techniques refer to their document at:

Combining power of Fiddler with Burp

Both are pretty powerful tools when it comes to intercept and modify http communications. But at some point of time, they become even more powerful combo if tied with each other. They complement each other. In a recent pentest I came across a similar situation where in Burp was not able to intercept a specific kind of traffic and Fiddler came to rescue. The application was designed to upload video. The initial communication was straight forward, I mean logging into application, filling up the video details etc. And all these were easily captured by Burp except the point where you hit the Upload Video and it connects to a different server and surprisingly it was not captured by Burp, not sure why, even after repeated attempts. So, I fired Fiddler to see if the it sees this request. But it's a;ways to play with requests using Burp due to it's various functionalities like, Intruder, Repeaters etc. But it was necessary to capture this request in Burp. So the below steps can be

File Upload through Null Byte Injection

Sometimes, during file upload we come across situation wherein there would be check on the file extension at the client side as well as server side too. If the application does allow only .jpeg extension to be uploaded, the client side java script checks for the extension of the file before passing the request. We all know that how easily this can be defeated. Some applications, checks for the extension at the server side also. That's not easy to bypass. However there are some ways with which it still can be bypassed. Most of server side scripts are written in high level languages such as Php, Java etc who still use some C/C++ libraries to read the file name and contents. That leads to the problem. In C/C++ a line ends with /00 or which is called Null Byte. So whenever the interpreter sees a null byte at the end of the a string, it stops reading thinking it has reached at the end of the string. This can be used for the bypass. It works for many servers, specially php servers. T